[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# RE: Unusual upgrade log messages...

- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 06:50:49 PST
- From:
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

    ----------
    From:  Jefferson M. Dubrule[SMTP:Jefferson.M.Dubrule@dartmouth.edu]

    --- Ron Stanions wrote:
    >I've seen these once or twice during other tests and didn't pay them any mind,
    then realized
    >waitasec, break, try, continue, aren't keywords that belong to 1.7.9...

    No, but they belong to 1.8.0.  They were probably variable/prop/verb names that
    were occupying
    reserved words that 1.8.0 wanted.  They were renamed to something innocuous.

    Indeed, I looked through the verbs again and lo and behold the keywords mentioned are being used as variable names.  However, taking #20:explode as an example, it used the word 'break' on lines 5, 7, 9, and 12, and renamed them to break_.  The confusion was that it mentioned this as a warning on line 18.

Follow-Ups:

- Re: Unusual upgrade log messages...

- From: Pavel Curtis <pavel@parc.xerox.com>

- Prev: Re: Unusual upgrade log messages...
- Next: Re: Unusual upgrade log messages...
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index