[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?

- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 17:16:31 PST
- From:
- cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 Feb 1996 15:19:55 PST." <9602170217.aa22823@usgate.paragraph.com>

    >I am not sure if it is a right place to ask, but maybe somebody
    >here will point me a to group discussing issues
    >related to MOO architecture based on VRML 2.0 ?
    >
    	A friend of mine is working with a coder, designing
    	a protocol to use a MOO server to serve VRML documents
    	and surface textures to a special MOO client; So the
    	user could get a 3d view of the room they are in and
    	of objects present there.

    |    Nick A. Rusnov, Tefcos, KSC -><-      | http://www.peak.org/~masked  |
    |       Collective Systems Group           |         My opinions.         |
    |Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.|   finger for pgp keyblock    |
    Archwizard of Retinal Fetish, comming this Summer.

References:

- MOO and VRML 2.0 ?

- From: Dmitri Kondratiev <dima@paragraph.com>

- Prev: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?
- Next: Re: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index