[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: $handle_uncaught_error

- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:32:59 PST
- From:
- Cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <199602160012.QAA27621@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>

    On Thu, 15 Feb 1996 slayer@kaiwan.com wrote:

    > >Is there any chance $handle_uncaught_error could be called with another
    > >argument made up of a list of all the variables defined in the tracebacking
    > >verb, along with their values?  Or maybe even all of the variables in all
    > >the calling verbs?
    > >
    > that sounds like a good idea, or at least the builtin ones like argstr,
    > dobjstr etc.
    > no sig, just me.
    >

    I have nearly completed a package to be installed in extensions.c that
    will include a builtin that functions as either callers() or task_stack(),
    except that it lists all variables in each stack frame.  I think that
    this will be able to do what you'd like...I will be posting an
    announcement here soon giving a URL for the package and a description of
    the functions included.

    ningolia@[oxygen|neon|stu].ci.lexington.ma.us
    ingolia@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu

References:

- Re: $handle_uncaught_error

- From: slayer@kaiwan.com

- Prev: Re: $handle_uncaught_error
- Next: (Fwd) A few questions
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index