# #0:handle_uncaught_error()

slayer@kaiwan.com (slayer@kaiwan.com)
Tue, 13 Feb 1996 16:35:44 PST

- Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

    >slayer@kaiwan.com writes:
    >> would it be better to have :handle_uncaught_error() called on the other
    >> connection object if the object being connected to is not #0?
    >
    >What object being connected to?  We're talking about arbitrary MOO tasks here.
    >
    Well, I had a web server being connected to an object and I wanted to nicely
    format the traceback messages for the web so the person can see the
    traceback if they are testing their objects, was easy enough to check that
    in #0, but I was wondering why it wasn't called on the object like some of
    the other system-related verbs.

    no sig, just me.