[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?

- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 12:55:52 PST
- From:
- cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <1.5.4b11.32.19960218203931.00685c54@mailbox.syr.edu>

    On Sun, 18 Feb 1996, Kipp the Kidd wrote:
    > I found that moo works fine with small text codes, such as RIPterm.  a
    > RIPterm picture takes about the same space as an object's description, so
    > simply sending a picture instead of a descripton takes no more work for the
    > MOO.  The 3d net client I hope to have finished soon will use quick codes
    > like RIP, and will download bitmap images from servers more capable of
    > handling big things like that...  a web server.

    Actually, as much as I hate RIP in a BBSing/ Telecommunications
    standpoint (preferring Galacticomm's Worldgroup C/S based architecture) I
    definately can see where RIP could be useful for MOOing!  Have you
    considered talking to Telegrafix or Durand Communication on possibly
    receiving the source?

References:

- Re: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?

- From: Kipp the Kidd <mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu>

- Prev: Re: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?
- Next: Re: MOO and VRML 2.0 ?
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index