[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: 1.8p2 weirdness...

- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 09:57:22 PST
- From:
- Cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
- In-reply-to: asb@media.mit.edu's message of "Fri, 22 Mar 1996 07:56:23 PST" <9603221556.AA27155@kilpikonna.media.mit.edu>

    asb@media.mit.edu writes:
    > This is another example of the same sort of problem that keeps coming up--one
    > task using too much memory.  Is it a good idea and would it be feasible to
    > implement a per-task memory limit?  (Possibly wiz-overrideable.)

    This is enormously difficult to implement in the current server in anything
    even approaching an efficient way.  It certainly won't happen on my watch and
    my guess is that it won't happen soon under any maintainer.

    	Pavel

References:

- Re: 1.8p2 weirdness...

- From: asb@media.mit.edu

- Prev: Re: 1.8p2 weirdness...
- Next: Re: 180 scattering
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index