[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: That patch I had...

- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 06:06:51 PST
- From:
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

    >> This code creates a builtin called sneak() (or it can be renamed).  It
    >> allows you to input direct commands into a player (connected or
    >> non-valid), as though the player typed the command himself/herself.  The
    >> form is: sneak(player, string);
    >
    >This code is almost exactly like the 'do_command()' patch that has been
    >floating around.  It is incredibly useful... PAVEL PLEASE INSTALL THIS!
    >Perhps it would be better if the command actually work directly on
    >unconnected people, instead of having to use $network...

    I can't see a use for this.  Why would a wizard want to cause another player to invoke commands?  Can't the wizard write code that doesn't require this sort of game-playing?  (How does this builtin handle the callers() stack?  Does it lie to callers() as well?)

    Seth / Blackbriar
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Seth I. Rich - sir@po.cwru.edu                         no, no quote.
    Rabbits on walls, no problem.                          it's far too cold.

Follow-Ups:

- Re: That patch I had...

- From: Joe Shaw <joeshaw@eskimo.com>

- Re: That patch I had...

- From: Kipp the Kidd <mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu>

- Prev: Re: That patch I had...
- Next: RE: That patch I had...
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index