[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: Hmm...

- Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 13:37:37 PDT
- From:
- cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960501155732.9015A-100000@net2>

    On Wed, 1 May 1996 bastian@net2.netacc.net wrote:

    > 1)  Where can I get the MOOServer for Windows95?

    A link to the current version as well as a WinMOO FAQ can be found at
    http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~cunkel/WinMOO/winmoo-faq.html

    The FAQ also includes directions to winmoo-l, the mailing list for
    discussion of WinMOO.

    > 2)  Has a version of FUP been worked out to match that?

    No.

    > 3)  Does it take standard LambdaCore, or does it need a special one?
    > 4)  Is it 1.7.* or 1.8.*?

    WinMOO 0.1.0beta1 is based on LambdaMOO 1.8.0p2.  It should handle any
    database that that version of LambdaMOO will deal with.  The
    WinMOOChangeLog.txt file, distributed with WinMOO and also available from
    the FAQ, details miscellaneous current deficiencies with beta1.

    WinMOO is currently in beta; I do *not* recommend using it in a prouction
    setting.

    Before using WinMOO, you should also read the sections of the LambdaMOO
    ChangeLog.txt about 1.8.0p3 and p4, as those changes are significant and
    are *not* currently incorporated in WinMOO.

      --Chris                           cunkel@engin.umich.edu
        ResComp Network Support Technician, Bursley Hall
        "Invisibility is in the eye of the beholder."
        Home Page: http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~cunkel/

References:

- Hmm...

- From: <bastian@net2.netacc.net>

- Prev: Hmm...
- Next: Holes in LamdaCore of December 94
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index