[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: #0:handle_uncaught_error()

- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 15:22:46 PST
- From:
- Cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
- In-reply-to: slayer@kaiwan.com's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 1996 09:33:31 PST" <199602131733.JAA04947@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>

    slayer@kaiwan.com writes:
    > would it be better to have :handle_uncaught_error() called on the other
    > connection object if the object being connected to is not #0?

    What object being connected to?  We're talking about arbitrary MOO tasks here.

    	Pavel

References:

- #0:handle_uncaught_error()

- From: slayer@kaiwan.com

- Prev: #0:handle_uncaught_error()
- Next: Re: #0:handle_uncaught_error()
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index