[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# 1.8.0

- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 09:48:10 PST
- From:
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

    At 05:42 PM 3/9/96 PST, Pavel Curtis wrote:
    >-- Verbs defined on #0 are no longer subject to the wiz-only permissions check
     [snip]
    >-- If a built-in function FOO has been made wiz-only [snip] and a call is made
        [snip] the server first checks to see if the verb #0:bf_FOO exists.

    Woo woo Pavel!

    I guess this means the last of Pavel's work on MOO :(  Have you found anyone
    to take over MOO?

    Oops -- guess not..  Just saw the binary bug.

    - Kipp
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
    GCS/CC d- s+:- a16 C++ UL++++ P+ L++ E-? W+ !N--@ !o-- K->K++++++
    w++(--) O- M-- V--? PS++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP-? t+ 5(+) X++ R+++(*)
    !tv b+ DI++++ D++++ G e* h!()(*) r+ !y+
    ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
    -----BEGIN NOT SO GEEKY BLOCK-----
    MOO projects:
      RPG Minimal.db:  paradigm.microwave.com 5000
      MOO2000:         moo.microwave.com 2000
      MundoHispano:    europa.syr.edu 8888
    ------END NOT SO GEEKY BLOCK------

- Prev: Re: 0-based indices for verbs in old code...
- Next: 1.8.0 bug?
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index