[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: That patch I had...

- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 06:52:32 PST
- From:
- cc: mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu, moo-cows@parc.xerox.com, jft@psychology.nottingham.ac.uk
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 19 Jan 96 01:24:55 PST." <9601190917.AA04431@ukhayq.CV.COM>

    > As an additional, thanks to Pavel for adding all we need to control
    > the sending of \r for better Web displays, serving binaries from the
    > MOO as an HTTPD (with the addition of FUP) and possibly building a
    > MOO-FTP server/client object, without having to hack the server for
    > it.

    I'm confused; I guess the only advantage I see to \r is octet-stream
    formats like gif.  Do you use selective \r elsewhere?

    Note that MOO isn't really well suited to serving static files
    anyway---there are plenty of high performance web servers around that
    will load your system far less.

    > The only changes we make now to the C are to add do_command and my
    > PEM decoder, and add the listassoc patch to speed up the stuff we do
    > a lot in HTML creation.

    Have you noticed a real speedup from listassoc?  Like one that's
    documentable?  I'm always interested in going after hotspots...

    > We will miss you.

    No, aim a little higher, and to the right---he's hiding behind that
    liveboard there... :-)

    Jay Carlson
    nop@nop.com    nop@kagoona.mitre.org

    Flat text is just *never* what you want.   ---stephen p spackman

References:

- Re: That patch I had...

- From: mark@ukhayq.cv.com (Mark R. Bowyer)

- Prev: RE: That patch I had...
- Next: Re: That patch I had...
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index