[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: call_function() and $bf_FOO()

- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 22:33:01 PDT
- From:
- Cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

    At 09:59 PM 4/27/96 PDT, slayer@kaiwan.com wrote:
    >>So?   If this happens, it obviously means something was programmed
    >>incorrectly and should raise an E_MAXREC.  What else could it do?

    I can't believe nobody here pointed this out...  From the changelog, IF THE
    VERB CONTAINING THE BUILTIN IS NOT ON #0, then $bf_FOO is called...  Thus,
    if it IS on #0, then $bf_FOO ISN'T called...  there's nothing recursive
    about this.

    - Kipp
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
    GCS/CC d- s+:- a16 C++ UL++++ P+ L++ E-? W+ !N--@ !o-- K->K++++++
    w++(--) O- M-- V--? PS++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP-? t+ 5(+) X++ R+++(*)
    !tv b+ DI++++ D++++ G e* h!()(*) r+ !y+
    ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
    -----BEGIN NOT SO GEEKY BLOCK-----
    MOO projects:
      MOO Core project:          paradigm.microwave.com 5000
      MOO2000:                   moo.microwave.com 2000
      MundoHispano:              europa.syr.edu 8888
    ------END NOT SO GEEKY BLOCK------

Follow-Ups:

- Re: call_function() and bf_FOO()

- From: Richard Godard <rgodard@divsun.unige.ch>

- Prev: Re: call_function() and $bf_FOO()
- Next: Re: call_function() and $bf_FOO()
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index