# My problem with #90:moveto acceptable

slayer@kaiwan.com (slayer@kaiwan.com)
Thu, 21 Mar 1996 13:08:37 PST

- Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

    >Actually, it's beening called as acceptable here (to determine if the
    >newly created object can be moved from #-1 to the player).
    >
    >I don't know what neat security features Frand's has on it for
    >acceptable, but whatever they are John removed them in favor of the ones
    >on #6 (which is the next ancestor defining acceptable).  The one on #6
    >defines anything that's not a player as acceptable.  So, if I'm a
    >programmer, and I control object x, I can move object x to you, unless
    >object x is a player.
    >
    it's the same verb with two names to combine them. It also handles @refuse
    accept so if you don't want people moving things into your inventory.