[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: MOO into C

- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:39:14 PDT
- From:
- CC: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
- In-reply-to: <1.5.4.32.19960725181918.00695e40@mailbox.syr.edu> (message from Kipp the Kidd on Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:19:18 PDT)

    >>>>> "Kipp" == Kipp the Kidd <mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu> writes:

        Kipp> <snip snip -- stuff about assembely and disassembling...>
        Kipp> Yeah, it could panic the server, but why not allow wizard
        Kipp> access to reading/writing compiled code to/from a verb?
        Kipp> Things like @copy will be alot more efficent, and I could
        Kipp> beef up Paradigm's swapping :)

        Kipp> If a way of applying compiled code was made, wouldn't it be
        Kipp> easier (and wiser and faster) to make the DB save compiled
        Kipp> code rather than decompiled?

        Kipp> - Kipp http://radioactivo.com.mx/~paradigm

    If compiled code was saved instead of decompiled, then the db would no
    longer be portable.  It would be locked into a particular machine type
    and operating system.

    Perhaps we need the option to save the working db in compiled form,
    yet have a utility that would decompile a saved db, so that it could
    still be ported to other machines.

    --
    --------  "And there came a writing to him from Elijah"  [2Ch 21:12]  --------
    Robert Jay Brown III  rj@eli.wariat.org  http://eli.wariat.org  1 847 705-0424
    Elijah Laboratories Inc.;  37 South Greenwood Avenue;  Palatine, IL 60067-6328
    -----  M o d e l i n g   t h e   M e t h o d s   o f   t h e   M i n d  ------

References:

- Re: MOO into C

- From: Kipp the Kidd <mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu>

- Prev: Re: MOO into C
- Next: Re: MOO into C
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index