# [SERVER] wishlist (was: logging)

Kipp the Kidd (mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu)
Wed, 31 Jan 1996 05:50:19 PST

- Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

    >What I think would be handy (and has been suggested already) is a way to
    >undeclare vars, e.g. 'release(foo);'. OTOH, as was pointed out, doing 'foo
    >= E_VARNF;' is almost as good. :)

    I agree.  I too often write programs where I include way too many variables
    and wish to free up a few, especially in really big tasks like a
    path-to-room search...

    I'm still trying to figure out if this would be good or not:
    What if the variable 's' wasn't defined, and the parser was given this:

    s=s+" ";

    How hard would it be to make 's' default to "" (or 0 or {} or 0.0)?  It
    might speed up performance (a little)...

    - Kipp
    `-!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-~`-!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-~`-!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-~`-!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-~`-!
    ` Kipp - Michael Mudge #     I like to live close to home    # Syracuse       !
    `     Owner of MOO2000 #       moo.microwave.com 2000        # New York       !
    `-!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-~`-!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-~`-!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-~`-!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-~`-!