[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: Does the new LambdaMOO core support Web?

- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 12:21:21 PDT
- From:
- cc: MOO-Cows.PARC@xerox.com
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-to: "<v02130503ad947b6eb53a@[132.76.55.130]> from \"Gustavo Glusman\" at Apr 12, 96 02:33:48 pm"

    Gustavo Glusman drew these hieroglyphs:
    >
    > Rog wrote:
    > >Hacking the server or doing anything that depends on DB file format
    > >(which is only sparsely documented and likely to change) is a less good
    > >idea.
    >
    > Allow me to disagree. From our experience, the simplest method for logging
    > is to fileappend() using FUP. Simple, quick, no scale-up problems, doesn't
    > change the size of the database, has many other advantages.
    >

    I have one reservation there: don't all FUP operations open the file,
    write it, then close it again?  It's a lot like leaving someone voice
    mail by making one phone call per sentence.

    I wouldn't mind having some FUP operations that treat files like MOO
    connections.  Sorta like the familiar socket model.

References:

- RE: Does the new LambdaMOO core support Web?

- From: bmgustav@bioinformatics.weizmann.ac.il (Gustavo Glusman)

- Prev: RE: Does the new LambdaMOO core support Web?
- Next: Re: Does the new LambdaMOO core support Web?
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index