[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db

- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 13:35:49 PST
- From:
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960321135136.5990B-100000@ren.us.itd.umich.edu> from "Christopher Unkel" at Mar 21, 96 11:30:32 am

    Ok, I realize what you are saying ... I now walk through the chain
    doing the c[x][1] == #-1 && .. check to find the next non-builtin.
    Thanks for pointing out the error in my reasoning. Another example
    of coding and sleep not mixing :).

    --- Zach Metzinger (Succubus)
    wizkid@ksu.ksu.edu

    > This will eliminate the tracebacks.  But (someone correct me if I'm
    > wrong) it doesn't perform the permission check that it used to.  If
    > callers()[2] is from a built-in, then it should look at whatever the next
    > element of callers() that does *not* represent a built-in, and apply the
    > :controls permission check to that entry.
    >
    >   --Chris                           cunkel@engin.umich.edu
    >     ResComp Network Support Technician, Bursley Hall
    >     "Invisibility is in the eye of the beholder."
    >     Home Page: http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~cunkel/

References:

- Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db

- From: Christopher Unkel <cunkel@us.itd.umich.edu>

- Prev: Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db
- Next: Bug in entering editors under 1.8
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index