# Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db

wizkid@borg.reshall.ksu.edu (wizkid@borg.reshall.ksu.edu)
Thu, 21 Mar 1996 13:35:49 PST

- Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

    Ok, I realize what you are saying ... I now walk through the chain
    doing the c[x][1] == #-1 && .. check to find the next non-builtin.
    Thanks for pointing out the error in my reasoning. Another example
    of coding and sleep not mixing :).

    --- Zach Metzinger (Succubus)
    wizkid@ksu.ksu.edu

    > This will eliminate the tracebacks.  But (someone correct me if I'm
    > wrong) it doesn't perform the permission check that it used to.  If
    > callers()[2] is from a built-in, then it should look at whatever the next
    > element of callers() that does *not* represent a built-in, and apply the
    > :controls permission check to that entry.
    >
    >   --Chris                           cunkel@engin.umich.edu
    >     ResComp Network Support Technician, Bursley Hall
    >     "Invisibility is in the eye of the beholder."
    >     Home Page: http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~cunkel/